The
SIM Card Terror Case
By Binoy Kampmark
18 July, 2007
Counterpunch
I am satisfied that the
cancellation is in the national interest.
Australian Immigration
Minister, Kevin Andrews, July 16, 2007
No
one can accuse Australia's John Howard (and his rather dreary acolytes)
for being uninventive. Yes, he was a touch obsessed with a consumer
tax in his second term ('I will never have a Goods and Consumer Tax'
John), the baby of most liberal market economies; and yes, he was obsessed
with muzzling trade unions.
For a time, it all seemed
rather tedious and uninventive. Howard was bathing in the same waters
Thatcher and Reagan had dipped their spears in. But in what sounds more
like an item you would purchase at a dollar shop, GWOT (Global War on
Terror) came along to rescue us from the mediocrity of just another
social policy, stolen from every economy which has succeeded in increasing
inequality.
We were, thankfully, rescued
from comfortable, easy, likeable John, defender of that fond fetish:
the hardy, sun-burnt Australian battler. In his stead came the paternal,
worried John, concerned that Australia's 'way of life' was being threatened
by shadowy warriors in a country that might, just might have weapons
of mass destruction. (Sadly, Saddam, before he left this life, proved
almost as inventive, calling his bluff.)
In terrorism, the Howard
government shows innovation to rank with J.K. Rowling. It has sent Potter-like
packages to the Australian public for bed time reading, though they
are mercifully less long and less widely read. Let's Look out for Australia,
distributed in 2003, was side-splitting fun. Be alert, not alarmed.
Ring a hotline if anything suspicious could be found, or seen, or sniffed.
The section on veiled Muslim girls and Chinese (in Australia, they are
still called 'Asian', whatever that means) was placed alongside a beach
cricket scene. Evidently, terrorists don't play cricket, though recent
evidence, vide India, Pakistan and England, would suggest otherwise.
And now, citizens, or rather
immigrants, must be careful to lend their SIM cards to their relatives.
The reasons might be honourable enough to use the rest of the
credit at some future date. The suggestion in Canberra is different:
They might end up in a global conspiracy to target civilians, stretching
from Scotland to Queensland, consumed in a Glaswegian fireball at a
rather ugly looking airport or plotting to blow up nightclubs.
Then, in Australia, the accessory
might actually be charged, as Indian doctor Haneef Mohammad was, for
providing 'reckless support' to a terrorist organisation (or to be more
exact, Sabeel and Kafeel Ahmed). Relatives should know better, though
I am sure all readers must know everything their second cousins get
up to. Naturally, not doing so renders you culpable.
The charge against Haneef,
whose visa has now been revoked after bail was actually granted by a
magistrate, is not merely an assault on the legal system but a gem of
creativity. Magistrate Jacqui Payne claimed that the prosecutors had
failed in providing evidence directly linking Haneef to a terrorist
organisation. But Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews had his thinking
cap on.
The genius of this government
move is obvious once you realise that a terrorist suspect must, by virtue
of this, be able to provide 'responsible' assistance to an organisation.
What that could be is hard to know, though Canberra might be willing
to supply a précis.
The Howard government's factory
of linguistic turns was certainly working overtime to spin the product.
Justice Jeffrey Spender of the Federal Court, who will hear Haneef's
appeal on August 8, was puzzled by the character test used by Andrews
in revoking the visa. 'Unfortunately I wouldn't pass the character test
on your statement because I've been associated with people suspected
of criminal conduct'. Such is the inventiveness of the rodent and his
associates.
Republican Senator Vandenberg
once told President Harry S. Truman that a sure way of getting money
through Congress for a first (or was it second?) round bout with the
Soviets in Greece and Turkey was 'to scare the hell out of the American
people'. He did. Howard's sense of history is often confused, but on
the score of cunning one of his current front bench did call him
a 'rodent' he scores highly. He will have to. Labor's Kevin Rudd
is breathing down his neck.
The grand old man of Australian
politics is feeling the strain. It is an election year, and election
years usually bring with them leaky boats (remember August 2001), veiled
warriors and terrorist 'sleepers'. This year, David Hicks, confined
to otherwise decay in the luxurious surroundings of a padded cell in
'Gitmo', was returned to South Australia. Then that nasty thing called
the climate reared its ugly, drought-stricken head.
But in the foreseeable months,
the importance of such wonders of the oft-abused word of 'civilisation'
such as habeas corpus and a bill of rights might be finally seen as
important. For a government keen to defend a certain way of life, overriding
the court order granting bail suggests an unsavoury vision.
With Australian 'intelligence'
authorities apparently investigating an Indian newspaper report claiming
Haneef belonged to the banned Student Islamic Movement of India, one
can rest well. We can continue being alert and not alarmed.
Binoy Kampmark
is a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He can be reached
at: [email protected]
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.