Home


Crowdfunding Countercurrents

Submission Policy

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

CounterSolutions

CounterImages

CounterVideos

Editor's Picks

Press Releases

Action Alert

Feed Burner

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Bradley Manning

India Burning

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis

Iraq

AfPak War

Peak Oil

Globalisation

Localism

Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

Kandhamal Violence

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

About Us

Disclaimer

Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name:
E-mail:

Search Our Archive



Our Site

Web

 

 

 

 

Pulping Intellectual Freedom: Academics Will Not Bow Down To Vigilantism

By Jamia Teachers' Solidarity Association

12 February, 2014
Countercurrents.org

It is an abject shame that Penguin will pulp Prof. Wendy Doniger's The Hindus: An Alternative History . That this decision was reached in a deal with the petitioners, with no consultation with the author compounds the folly.  Coming in the wake of Oxford University Press' similar meek surrender by suspending publication of Paula Richman's Many Ramayanas – though forced to revert its decision in the aftermath of a spirited protest by senior academics from across the world – and the Delhi University's purging of A.K. Ramanujam's essay, “Three Hundred Ramayanas”, this episode shows that mighty publishing houses and premier universities will crumble under the slightest attack on academic freedom. 

Wendy Doniger writes on subjects long considered taboo by mainstream Indologists: animals, sex, violence – but her style of writing, full of wit and humor and storytelling, was beloved of many outside of academia. This has also turned her into an object of scorn and hatred among Hindutva groups, especially among the diaspora. The low level of attacks – from the egg thrown at her in London to distasteful speculation of her personal sexuality by a US-based Indian businessman, patron and poseur of Right wing Hindu Studies – has only exposed the shallowness of her critics.

In 2003, Paul Courtright's Ganesha: Lord of Obstacles, Lord of Beginnings was similarly attacked for its psychoanalytic approach. A petition by Hindu Students Council in the US demanded from the author an “unequivocal apology to the Hindus”, leading the publisher Motilal Banarsidas to swiftly withdraw the book with the promise that such a “lapse” would never occur again. The petition also insisted that Coutright re-write the passages which the petitioners found offensive and issue a revised version with clarifications.

This demand that academic study of religion be directed by, and tailored for a community of believers, with an unlimited potential for ‘hurt' is simply preposterous and thoroughly unacceptable.  Many of us – Historians, sociologists, Indologists – are engaged in scholarship on religion. Some of us are believers, some are not. Some of us study our own communities, many train their lenses on others.

We believe that all scholarship is open to criticism – especially by those who claim to speak on behalf of the community, as insiders. Indeed, it would add to the richness of debate. However, threats, personal attacks, calls for censorship and recourse to perennially offended sentiments cannot be permitted to hold academic enquiry to ransom.

As academics, we will robustly defend our right to work on themes of our choice with theoretical frameworks of our choosing.

A.Ram Babu, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

Abhijit Kundu, Dept. of Sociology, Sri Venketeswara College, University of Delhi

Adil Mehdi, Dept. of English, JMI, Delhi

Adnan Farooqui, Dept. of Political Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi

Ahmed Sohaib, Centre for the Study of Comparative Religions, JMI, Delhi

Ambarien Alqadr, MCRC, JMI, Delhi

Amit Sengupta, Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Delhi

Brinda Bose, Department of English, University of Delhi

Dhrub Kumar Singh, Dept of History, Benaras Hindu University, Benaras

Faiz Ullah, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

Ghazala Jamil, Independent Researcher, Delhi

Ghazi Shahnawaz, Dept. of Psychology, JMI, Delhi

Harsh Dobhal, Sharada University, NOIDA

Jairus Banaji, SOAS, UK

Manisha Sethi, Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Delhi

Manoj Jena, Dept. of Sociology, JMI, Delhi

M.S. Bhatt, Dept. of Economics, JMI, Delhi

Mohan Rao, Centre for Social Medicine and Community Health, JNU, Delhi

Mona Das, Satywati College, University of Delhi

Nabanipa Bhattacharya, Dept. of Sociology, Sri Venketeswara College, University of Delhi

Rahul Govind, Dept. of History, University of Delhi

Rochelle Pinto, Dept. of English, University of Delhi

Sanghamitra Misra, Dept. of History, University of Delhi

Shohini Ghosh, MCRC, JMI, Delhi

Sucharita Sengupta, Dept. of Political Science, JMI, Delhi

Tabir Kalam, Dept of History, Benaras Hindu University, Benaras

Tanweer Fazal, Nelson Mandela Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution, JMI

Released by Jamia Teachers' Solidarity Association on 12 th February 2014.

www.teacherssolidarity.org

 



 

Share on Tumblr

 

 


Comments are moderated