Use
Of Dogs Was Authorized
By Josh White
and Scott Higham
13 June, 2004
Washington Post
More
torture and abuse pictures here
U.S.
intelligence personnel ordered military dog handlers at the Abu Ghraib
prison in Iraq to use unmuzzled dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees
during interrogations late last year, a plan approved by the highest-ranking
military intelligence officer at the facility, according to sworn statements
the handlers provided to military investigators.
A military intelligence
interrogator also told investigators that two dog handlers at Abu Ghraib
were "having a contest" to see how many detainees they could
make involuntarily urinate out of fear of the dogs, according to the
previously undisclosed statements obtained by The Washington Post.
The statements by
the dog handlers provide the clearest indication yet that military intelligence
personnel were deeply involved in tactics later deemed by a U.S. Army
general to be "sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses."
President Bush and
top Pentagon officials have said the criminal abuse at Abu Ghraib was
confined to a small group of rogue military police soldiers who stripped
detainees naked, beat them and photographed them in humiliating sexual
poses. An Army investigation into the abuse condemned the MPs for those
practices, but also included the use of unmuzzled dogs to frighten detainees
among the "intentional abuse."
So far, the only
charges to emerge have been against seven MPs and do not include any
dog incidents, even though such use of dogs is an apparent violation
of the Geneva Conventions and the Army's field manual. The military
intelligence officer in charge of Abu Ghraib later told investigators
that the use of unmuzzled dogs in interrogation sessions was recommended
by a two-star general and that it was "okay."
The newly obtained
documents reinforce the picture that the abuse falls into two categories:
sexual humiliation and beatings at the hands of MPs, and intimidation
using dogs that is clearly tied to military intelligence. The sexual
abuse happened weeks and even months before the dog incidents, some
of which appear to be part of an organized strategy by military intelligence
to scare detainees into talking, according to the statements.
Sgts. Michael J.
Smith and Santos A. Cardona, Army dog handlers assigned to Abu Ghraib,
told investigators that military intelligence personnel requested that
they bring their dogs to prison interrogation sites multiple times to
assist in questioning detainees in December and January. Col. Thomas
M. Pappas, who was in charge of military intelligence at the prison,
told both soldiers that the use of dogs in interrogations had been approved,
according to the statements.
"I have talked
to Col. Papus [sic] and he said it was good to go," Smith told
an investigator on Jan. 23.
Neither Smith nor
Cardona has been charged in connection with the abuse at Abu Ghraib.
"It's all under investigation," said Lt. Col. Pamela Hart,
an Army spokeswoman.
The men could not
be reached yesterday to comment. Two officers at the U.S. Army Trial
Defense Service said that a military lawyer has been assigned to Cardona
and that a message seeking a comment would be relayed to the attorney.
The officers said they did not know whether a lawyer from the Army's
defense service had been assigned to represent Smith.
In Army memos regarding
interrogation techniques at the prison, the use of military working
dogs was specifically allowed -- as long as higher-ranking officers
approved the measures. According to one military intelligence memo obtained
by The Post, the officer in charge of the military intelligence-run
interrogation center at the prison had to approve the use of dogs in
interrogations. There is no explanation in the memo of what parameters
would have to be in place -- for example, whether the dogs would be
muzzled or unmuzzled -- or what the dogs would be allowed to do. The
Army previously has said that the commanding general of U.S. troops
in Iraq -- Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez -- would have had to approve
the use of dogs.
Human rights experts
said the use of dogs at Abu Ghraib violates longstanding tenets regulating
the treatment of prisoners and civilians under the control of an occupying
force, including the Army's field manual, which prohibits "acts
of violence or intimidation" by American soldiers.
"Using dogs
to frighten and intimidate prisoners is a violation of the Geneva Convention,"
said Elisa Massimino, Washington director of Human Rights First, an
international organization based in New York. "It's a violation
of U.S. policy as stated in the Army field manual, and it's a violation
of the prohibition against cruel treatment."
The dog teams at
Abu Ghraib were part of a security detail that also searched for weapons,
explosives and contraband. The general in charge of military prisons
in Iraq, including Abu Ghraib, said the dog teams were under the control
of military intelligence but had no training or experience in helping
with interrogations.
Cardona's dog, a
tan Belgian Malinois named Duco, was trained to be part of a narcotics
and patrol team. Cardona told investigators he also helped military
intelligence with two interrogations and later was summoned by military
police to draw information out of a detainee on Tier 1 of the prison,
site of the worst documented abuse.
Smith said military
intelligence personnel asked him to instill fear in detainees. He said
that he would bring his dog, a black Belgian shepherd named Marco, to
the tier specifically to scare prisoners after they were pulled out
of their cells. At the behest of interrogators, he said, in some cases
he would bring the barking dog to within six inches of the prisoners.
"Is using the
dog in this manner an allowable tool by the MI interrogators?"
an investigator asked Smith.
"Yes,"
he replied.
The dog handlers
arrived at Abu Ghraib in late November, sometime after the abuse of
detainees had been captured in photographs, including the images of
the naked human pyramid and forced masturbation.
Master-at-Arms 1st
Class William J. Kimbro, a Navy dog handler, said he was summoned to
Tier 1 one night in November to help search a cell for explosives using
his dog, Nicky, a black and tan Belgian Malinois. Earlier that night
-- records indicate it was Nov. 24 -- a prisoner had allegedly been
found with a weapon. When Kimbro and Nicky concluded the search, they
were called to the second floor of the cellblock to search another cell.
"There was
a bunch of yelling going on in the cell and my dog started going ape,"
Kimbro told investigators, adding that interrogators were yelling at
a detainee in the corner. "I remember one of the males saying to
the detainee, if the detainee did not provide the information the guy
was asking about, then he would have me let . . . my dog go on him."
Kimbro said he was
surprised by the comment and tried to calm Nicky down. He soon left,
he said, upset that interrogators had tried to use his dog as an interrogation
tool.
"I was leaving
because this is not what my dog is trained for," Kimbro said in
one of three statements he provided to investigators. "We do not
use our dogs for interrogation purposes."
Kimbro was singled
out for praise in Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba's report about abuse at
the prison for refusing "to participate in improper interrogations
despite significant pressure from the MI personnel at Abu Ghraib."
Smith and Cardona
said they complied with the MI requests because they believed the tactics
had been approved by Pappas, the military intelligence officer in charge
of the prison. They told investigators that they spent time on the cellblocks,
allowing their dogs to bark at the detainees.
They said a non-commissioned
officer from military intelligence approached them in mid-December.
"He asked us
if we could use our dogs for interrogation purposes," Cardona said
in a statement. "They were trying to get it cleared. We went outside
and saw Col. Pappas. He told us MI wanted to use the dogs for interrogations
and he told us that they had received permission to use dogs in an interview."
Smith recalled the
same conversation, saying he spoke with Pappas in the parking lot the
night after Saddam Hussein was captured -- Dec. 14. He said he was told
that the use of the dogs was permitted.
Later that night,
the two dog handlers took their dogs to an interrogation booth holding
a detainee. Interrogators told them the dogs did not need to be muzzled,
they said.
"When we got
to the room the detainee was sitting in the doorway, with his feet in
the doorway and the door was open," Smith said. "My dog and
Sgt. Cardona's dog were both barking at the detainee and we never got
closer than 18 inches. Neither dog had a muzzle on."
Also in mid-December,
the dog handlers said they were asked by one of the MPs, Staff Sgt.
Ivan L. "Chip" Frederick II, for help in dealing with an uncooperative
detainee. Part of what followed was captured in photographs that have
come to define the abuse at Abu Ghraib: A naked prisoner was up against
a wall, two dogs squaring off against him.
The detainee, identified
in the documents as Ballendia Sadawi Mohammed, said he was suddenly
snatched from his bed in cell No. 5 one night and sent into the hallway
handcuffed.
"They sent
the dogs toward me. I was scared," Mohammed told investigators.
"The first dog bit my leg and injured me there and this was bad
luck. The bite from the first dog caused me to have 12 stitches from
the doctor of my left leg as a result I lost a lot of blood."
Spec. Sabrina D.
Harman, a member of the 372nd Military Police Company, said she saw
the incident and said the detainee was bitten after he tried to run
from the dog and was cornered. Cardona, whose dog apparently bit the
detainee twice, once on each leg, justified letting his dog go to the
end of its leash because he believed the detainee was fighting with
Spec. Charles A. Graner Jr.
Military investigative
records show that Frederick and Graner were key participants in the
abuse. Harman, who said she saw two other inmates with dog bites around
late December, also has been charged.
In early January,
Cardona said, he used his dog during an interrogation at the "Wood"
facility at Abu Ghraib, a collection of wooden interrogation booths
set up behind the prison. Cardona said a non-commissioned military intelligence
officer asked him to bring his dog into a booth and make it bark to
scare the prisoner.
"I asked him
if he wanted Duco to be in a muzzle and he said no," Cardona told
investigators. "We went into the booth and there was a detainee
in the booth with a bag over his head. Duco barked at him for about
two or three minutes and they were asking the detainee questions."
On Jan. 13, Spec.
John Harold Ketzer, a military intelligence interrogator, saw a dog
team corner two male prisoners against a wall, one prisoner hiding behind
the other and screaming, he later told investigators.
"When I asked
what was going on in the cell, the handler stated that he was just scaring
them, and that he and another of the handlers was having a contest to
see how many detainees they could get to urinate on themselves,"
Ketzer said.
Research editor
Margot Williams contributed to this report.
© 2004 The
Washington Post Company