Of Bush Gang Swore
Under Oath Saddam Was Behind 9/11
By Evelyn Pringle
28 October, 2006
to the dismay of the Bush administration, Americans can remember all
on their own, without any help from Democrats, that in the run up to
the war in Iraq, it was top White House officials who were making the
claim that Saddam was in cahoots with bin Laden and secretly involved
The fact that the administration's
disinformation campaign was overwhelmingly successful was evidenced
by an October 2004, Harris Poll, taken three weeks before the last presidential
election, that found 62% of all voters, and 84% of those planning to
vote for Bush, still believed that Saddam had ''strong links" to
Al Qaeda, and that 41% of all voters, and 52% of Bush backers, believed
that Saddam had ''helped plan and support the hijackers" who had
attacked the country on 9/11.
As we now know, the basis
for these allegations was false, but the saddest part of the sordid
tale is that many Americans are just now beginning to realize that Bush
knew the stories were false for more than a year when he cited them
as justification for taking the country to war.
Documents since declassified
and made public show that the administration was warned by the Defense
Intelligence Agency in February 2002, that the tale about a trip to
Prague by the leader of the 9/11 highjackers, Mohamed Atta, had come
from an unreliable drunk, and that the story about Iraqis training members
of al Qaeda on the use of chemical and biological weapons was deliberately
fabricated by an Iraqi defector.
The debate over who was most
responsible for convincing the nation that there was a link between
Saddam and 9/11 will probably continue for years but an important piece
of the puzzle can be found by zeroing in on a woman by the name of Laurie
Mylroie, a person most people have never heard of.
Mylroie had been pushing
for an all-out war against Iraq for a decade and in the run-up to the
first Gulf war, she, along with the since fired New York Times reporter,
Judith Miller, wrote a book titled, "Saddam Hussein and the Crisis
in the Gulf."
Mylroie was enmeshed in the
Iraq war obsession which originated at the American Enterprise Institute,
a conservative think-tank that served as a home base for the many neocons
rendered powerless during the Clinton years, such as Richard Perle,
who became chairman of the Defense Policy Board under Bush, and Paul
Wolfowitz, who moved into the number-2 position at the Pentagon when
Bush took office, along with Newt Gingrich and John Bolton, to name
a few others.
In the year 2000, at a time
when Dick Cheney sat on AEI's board, the group's publishing arm published
a book written by Mylroie, with the help of many neocons, titled, "A
Study in Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America."
In the author's acknowledgement
section of the book, Mylroie thanked a familiar cast of characters for
their assistance and included John Bolton and the entire staff of AEI.
She also noted a special thanks to Scooter Libby for his "generous
and timely assistance."
In addition, Mylroie said
of Paul Wolfowitz: "At critical times, he provided crucial support
for a project that is inherently difficult." She said that Wolfowitz's
wife (at the time), had "fundamentally shaped the book."
Top neocon-hawk, Richard
Perle, described the book as "splendid and wholly convincing."
If Mylroie is to be believed,
Saddam was involved in every anti-American attack that took place since
the early 1990s all over the globe, from the bombings of US embassies
in Tanzania and Kenya, which she states may have been "the work
of both bin Laden and Iraq," to the federal building in Oklahoma
She accuses Saddam of being
involved in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center even though the
FBI, the Joint Terrorism Task Force in New York, the US Attorney's office
in the Southern District of New York, the CIA, the National Security
Council, and the State Department, have all determined that there was
no evidence of the Iraq's involvement in the WTC attack.
Mylroie also claims that
the TWA flight 800 which crashed into Long Island Sound was an Iraqi
plot even after a lengthily investigation by the National Transportation
Safety Board determined that it was an accident.
She maintains that in 2000,
Saddam provided the expertise for the bombing of the USS Cole, and was
responsible for the deaths of 17 sailors, even though no law enforcement
agency has ever made such a claim and even blames Saddam for the anthrax
sent through the mail shortly after 9/11.
Once Bush became president,
the neocons were brought back into power as either members of the administration
or members of the Defense Policy Board, and a war against Iraq became
the administration's obsession, with Mylroie and the hawks working hand
and hand to promote the theory that the war was necessary because of
Saddam's involvement in every terrorist act against the US over the
When the neocon's wish for
another "Pearl Habor like attack" came true on 9/11, the race
towards Iraq was on and the propaganda machine picked up speed. As a
first step, they had Harper Collins reissue Mylroie's book under the
new title, "The War Against America." The foreword for the
second edition was written by DPB member James Woolsey, who described
Mylroie's work as "brilliant and brave."
The book's cover displayed
an endorsement from Paul Wolfowitz which stated: "Provocative and
disturbing ... argues powerfully that the shadowy mastermind of the
1993 World Trade Center bombing ... was in fact an agent of Iraqi intelligence."
In the second book's acknowledgments,
Mylroie thanked Wolfowitz for being "kind enough to listen to this
work presented orally and later to read the manuscript. At critical
times, he provided crucial support for a project that is inherently
difficult." She also praised John Bolton for his assistance.
Now, a nutcase like Mylroie,
if left to her own devices, would probably have been harmless. But when
the neocons made her a consultant to the Bush Pentagon, the job added
misplaced credibility to her hair-brained Saddam-bin Laden conspiracy
There is no doubt that she
was hired to convince the world that Saddam played a role in 9/11 and
although I don't know how much she was paid, its pretty obvious that
the Bush gang got a lot of bang for the buck.
The month before the war
began, in February 2003, Mylroie was featured for an interview on Canadian
television where she discussed why Bush was going to war against Iraq
and at the same time, emphasized the certainty of a Saddam-9/11 link.
Shortly after the interview got underway, she stated:
"Listen, we're going
to war because President Bush believes Saddam Hussein was involved in
9/11. Al Qaeda is a front for Iraqi intelligence…[the U.S.] bureaucracy
made a tremendous blunder that refused to acknowledge these links …
the people responsible for gathering this information, say in the C.I.A.,
are also the same people who contributed to the blunder on 9/11 and
the deaths of 3,000 Americans, and so whenever this information emerges
they move to discredit it."
Contrary to what the Bush
team says today, according to Mylroie back then, it doesn't sound like
the CIA was claiming that there was a link between Saddam and bin Laden.
It sounds like the CIA was saying the opposite and that Mylroie was
blaming the CIA for the 9/11 attacks because the agency had not agreed
with the neocon's assessment of Saddam's threat to the US and pushed
for a war in Iraq sooner.
The next month, on March
12, 2003, Mylroie wrote an article for the New York Sun titled, "Blind
to Saddam's 9-11 Role," and told readers that Bush believed Saddam
was in on 9/11, and claimed that was why he was taking the country to
war against Iraq:
"Iraq, along with Al
Qaeda, was most probably involved in the September 11 attacks, and President
Bush understands that. Already on September 17, six days later, Mr.
Bush affirmed, "I believe Iraq was involved, but I'm not going
to strike them now," as Bob Woodward's "Bush at War"
"Indeed, at Thursday's
press conference, Mr. Bush said that Iraq has financed and trained Al
Qaeda and similar terrorist groups," Mylroie added. "That
is why Mr. Bush is willing to take the risk entailed in war against
Iraq," she said.
At one point, Mylroie attempted
to convince the 9/11 Commission that, "there is substantial reason
to believe that these masterminds [of both the '93 and 9/11 Trade Center
attacks] are Iraqi intelligence agents."
However, her testimony was
apparently not persuasive, because in regard to the 9/11 attacks, the
Commission's final report states that the “Intelligence Community
has no credible information that Baghdad had foreknowledge of the 11
September attacks or any other al-Qaida strike.”
Some of Mylroie's more recent
endeavors included writing a book titled, "Bush vs. the Beltway:
How the CIA and the State Department tried to Stop the War on Terror."
This title is somewhat baffling in light of the speeches by Bush himself
stating that everyone was in agreement with his assessment of the need
to go to war, and that it was the evidence produced by the intelligence
agencies, and not his White House, that led to the war against Iraq.
According to its title, this
book claims that the CIA tried to "Stop" the war, and to be
sure, Mylroie would not have chosen this title had it not won the approval
of the Bush propaganda machine.
The fact is that in the run
up to war, Mylroie wore a variety of hats. But her most important job
by far came when she testified as an expert witness in a lawsuit filed
against a group of defendants that included Saddam, bin Laden, the Taliban,
the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, al-Qaeda, and the Republic of Iraq.
The suit was filed by families
on behalf of the estates of two 9/11 victims, George Eric Smith and
The lawsuit represents the
one and only time that the truth or falsity of the Saddam-9/11 connection
has been put to the test. In the end, the Judge in the case delivered
a verdict in favor of the families based on specific claims by Mylroie
and other top Bush administration officials, that a definite link between
Saddam and 9/11 did in fact exist.
US District Court Judge,
Harold Baer, entered a default judgment for the plaintiffs in January
2003, because the time allowed for a response by the defendants had
passed, and they had failed to file an answer to the plaintiffs' complaint.
In March 2003, Judge Baer
held two days of hearings to determine the amount of damages that should
be awarded and the lawyers for the plaintiffs presented evidence that
they claimed established a "conclusive link" between Saddam
and 9/11, and included declassified interviews with Iraqi defectors
who appeared on a television news show and said that Saddam used a jet
airplane in a remote area of Iraq to train the 9/11 hijackers.
However, by far, the most
convincing evidence came from under oath testimony by former CIA Director,
R James Woolsey, a member of the Bush administration's Defense Policy
Board at the time, along with the statements made by Colin Powell and
On May 8, 2003, Judge Baer
released his written findings in the case and awarded damages to the
plaintiffs in the amount of $104 million, to be paid by Saddam, bin
Laden, al-Qaida, the Taliban, and the former Iraqi government.
In his decision, Judge Baer
explained that he had based his findings on the statements of Woolsey,
Powell, Tenet, and Mylroie, all of whom he considered experts on the
Saddam-9/11 connection, he said: "The opinion testimony of the
plaintiffs' experts is sufficient to meet plaintiffs' burden that Iraq
collaborated in or supported bin Laden/al Qaeda's terrorist acts of
September 11. . ." he wrote.
"Their opinions, coupled
with their qualifications as experts on this issue," Judge Baer
wrote, "provide a sufficient basis for a reasonable jury to draw
inferences which could lead to the conclusion that Iraq provided material
support to al Qaeda and that it did so with knowledge and intent to
further al Qaeda's criminal acts."
The judge cited a few specific
statements that had been made by Tenet and Powell, that he had relied
upon in formulating a believe that there was a link between Saddam and
"Both Director Tenet
and Secretary Powell mentioned 'senior level contacts' between Iraq
and al Qaeda going back to the early 1990s [although both acknowledged
that part of the interactions in the early to mid-1990s pertained to
achieving a mutual non-aggression understanding];" Baer noted,
"both mentioned that al Qaeda sought to acquire poison gas and
training in its use from Iraq; both mentioned that al Qaeda members
have been in Iraq, including Baghdad, after September 2001. . . ."
"Director Tenet's carefully
worded letter included in substance the same allegations," the
judge wrote, "but with less detail, than Secretary of State Colin
Powell made before the U.N. Security Counsel on Feb. 5, 2003, in his
remarks about 'the potentially much more sinister nexus between Iraq
and the al-Qaida terrorist network. . . .' "
He also outlined the testimony
he relied upon provided by Woolsey. "[Former CIA] Director [James]
Woolsey," the Judge wrote, "reviewed several facts that tended
in his view to show Iraq's involvement in acts of terrorism against
the United States in general and likely in the events of September 11
The Judge discussed specific
portions of Woolsey's testimony that led to his ruling against the defendants,
and stated in part: "First, Director Woolsey described the existence
of a highly secure military facility in Iraq where non-Iraqi fundamentalists
[e.g., Egyptians and Saudis] are trained in airplane hijacking and other
forms of terrorism."
"Through satellite imagery
and the testimony of three Iraqi defectors, [he] demonstrated the existence
of this facility, called Salman Pak, which has an airplane but no runway,"
the decision noted. "The defectors also stated that these fundamentalists
were taught methods of hijacking using utensils or short knives,"
Judge Baer wrote.
"Second," he continued,
"Director Woolsey mentioned a meeting that allegedly occurred in
Prague in April 2001 between Mohammad Atta, the apparent leader of the
hijackings, and a high-level Iraqi intelligence agent."
"According to James
Woolsey," the Judge wrote, "the evidence indicates that this
was an 'operational meeting' because Atta flew to the Czech Republic
and then returned to the United States shortly afterwards."
Baer explained, "Woolsey noted that his conclusion was also based
on 'contacts,' which refer to interactions between Hussein/Iraq and
bin Laden/al Qaeda that are described in a letter from George Tenet,
the Director of Central Intelligence, to Senator Bob Graham on October
In his findings, the judge
next focused on the testimony of Mylroie, and it is apparent that he
believed her claims that Saddam was involved in all of the terrorist
attacks against the US dating back to the early 1990s.
"Dr. Mylroie described
Iraq's covert involvement in acts of terrorism against the United States
in the past, including the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993,"
Baer stated in his opinion.
"Dr. Mylroie testified
to at least four events that served as the basis for her conclusion
that Iraq played a role in the September 11 tragedy," he wrote.
"First," he said,
"she claimed that Iraq provided and continues to provide support
to two of the main perpetrators of the bombing of the World Trade Center
"Second," he wrote,
"she noted bin Laden's fatwah against the United States, which
was motivated by the presence of U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia to fight
the Gulf War against Iraq."
"Third," the judge
stated, "she noted that threats by bin Laden in late 1997 and early
1998 which led up to the bombing of the U.S. embassies [on August 7,
1998] were 'in lockstep' with Hussein's threats about ousting the U.N.
weapons inspectors, which he eventually did on August 5, 1998."
Judge Baer also quoted other
portions of her testimony and said, "Dr. Mylroie concluded that
'Iraq, I believe, did provide support and resources for the September
11 attacks. I agree with [Iraqi defector] Captain [Sabah] Khodada when
he said that ... it took a state like Iraq to carry out an attack as
really sophisticated, massive and deadly as what happened on September
After hearing the assertions
of these top administration officials, Judge Baer concluded that: "Plaintiffs
have shown, albeit barely, 'by evidence satisfactory to the court' that
Iraq provided material support to bin Laden and al Qaeda."
The judge's decision is proof
of the fact that the White House is home to the guilty parties who deliberately
misled Americans about a bogus link between Saddam and 9/11, months
before the war began. His written findings document the fraud perpetrated
on the country by top Bush administration officials.
For those Americans still
wondering about a motive for Bush taking the country to war in Iraq,
the first and foremost goal of the neocons was to gain control of the
world's oil supply and the number two goal, was to set up a war profiteering
scheme to funnel billions of tax dollars into their own bank accounts
for many years to come.
Its really that simple.
My advice to any disbeliever,
is to go on the internet and do a google search on Iraq and war profiteering
and find out who in the administration and the Bush family stood to
benefit the most off a war in Iraq and read the names of those who have
benefited the most so far.
A quick 15-minute search
will prove that the roots of the scheme were planted firmly in the back
yard of the White House and the fruits have not fallen far from the
is a columnist for OpEd News and an investigative journalist focused
on exposing corruption in government and corporate AmericaEmail:
Share Your Insights