Join News Letter

Iraq War

Peak Oil

Climate Change

US Imperialism

Palestine

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Globalisation

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Gujarat Pogrom

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

Contact Us

Fill out your
e-mail address
to receive our newsletter!
 

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

 

Shias Pick Kingpin

By Nermeen Al-Mufti

20 January, 2006
Al-Ahram


The United Iraqi Alliance has nominated Ibrahim Al-Jaafari as prime minister. He is Iraq's current interim prime minister and has been criticised over the deterioration of security and public services in the country. The Kurds have reservations about Al-Jaafari because of his position on Kirkuk, which he refuses to incorporate into northern Iraq until a public census is conducted. President Jalal Talabani once said that Al-Jaafari tends to monopolise decision-making.

Al-Jaafari's nomination came after Hassan Al-Shehrestani and Nadim Al-Jabri withdrew their candidacies for the post. Turkoman parliamentarian Fawzi Akram told Al-Ahram Weekly that, "because of the rivalry between Adel Abdul-Mahdi and Al-Jaafari, the United Iraqi Alliance decided to put the matter to a vote. In the vote, which took place at the headquarters of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, Al-Jaafari got 64 votes and Abdul- Mahdi 63 votes... Al-Jaafari has the support of the Al-Sadr group, a block that has 30 parliamentary seats."

Speaking at a news conference after his nomination, Al-Jaafari said that security would be the first priority for his government, followed by economy, services, and reconstruction. "The coming government should be one of national unity; one that encompasses all the components of the Iraqi people," the prime minister said. He promised that the government would rely heavily on experts and technocrats.

The nomination of Al-Jaafari came about through a democratic vote among the Shias, but will it be acceptable to other parliamentarian blocks?

Ammar Al-Ameri is an expert in Iraqi domestic affairs. He said, "since the elections ended, both the Iraqi National Alliance Front of Adnan Al-Duleimi and the block of Iyad Allawi have been saying that the ministries of defence and interior should not be run by people with political and doctrinal allegiances, but by technocrats instead. The fear now is that someone from the United Iraqi Alliance would take one of these two ministries... But one has to admit that Al-Jaafari is the best available candidate, for he has succeeded in maintaining good ties with most Sunni clans and has been firm on the matter of Kirkuk."

Sinan Al-Kobeisi, an independent politician, wants Al-Jaafari to speak out on foreign presence in the country. "I don't know why Al-Jaafari is silent on the occupation and the presence of foreign forces in the country... I hope that Al-Jaafari addresses the matter of security and getting foreign troops out of the cities. The current situation endangers the lives of Iraqis who come under friendly fire or get caught up in attacks on the patrols of foreign forces. Al-Jaafari should be a prime minister for all Iraqis. His government should seek a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces. It should also tackle the problem of administrative corruption and theft."

The day following Al-Jaafari's nomination, the trial of Saddam Hussein resumed. The former president and seven of his aides, who had boycotted two sessions, were forcibly brought to court by order of the presiding judge, Raouf Abdul-Rahman. Defence attorneys continue to boycott the court and demand that the current chief judge be replaced. Saddam looked indignant when he entered the court. He railed against "traitors", denounced President Bush, and insulted the judge. Attempts by the judge to bring order to the courtroom failed as Saddam and his brother, Barzan Al-Tikriti, continued to rant and challenge the court's authority. Lawyer Mohamed Al-Omar said that former Judge Rizgar Amin was courteous towards the defendants not because he liked Saddam but because he saw the trial as an attempt to appease the public.

Abu Ammar, a former army officer, is sceptical about the trial. "The collective punishment the deposed regime meted out to the inhabitants of Dujail following the attempt on Saddam's life was against law and humanity. But let me tell you this, when a helicopter was downed in Tarmiya three weeks ago, US forces cordoned off the entire area from Tarmiya to Dujail and arrested hundreds of young people. And yet they failed to identify those who shot down the plane. There is a pattern here. Perhaps we should have more trials."

© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly.

Google
WWW www.countercurrents.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Search Our Archive



Our Site

Web