Iran's
Elections Bolster Hardliners
By Angus McDowall
in Tehran
The
Independent
22 February 2004
Hardliners in Iran could pursue a more
aggressive nuclear policy and crack down on the country's reformists
after taking control of parliament in an election boycotted by their
opponents.
Pragmatic conservatives
struck a deal with Britain, France and Germany last November to open
Iran's nuclear facilities to inspection, hoping a softer international
line could buy some respite on the scrutiny of domestic issues, such
as human rights. But many hardliners were deeply unhappy with the deal,
and Western diplomats believe they see the stifling of domestic opposition
as an opportunity to pursue a weapons programme more rapidly.
The US, which was
suspicious of the deal in the first place, had its concern reinforced
by the discovery last week of advanced centrifugal equipment for enriching
uranium to weapons grade. Iran had failed to declare the equipment,
and has had its involvement in the international nuclear black market
exposed by the downfall of Pakistan's nuclear "father", Abdul
Qadeer Khan.
In a blow to the
reformist cause, turnout in Friday's election to the Majlis was far
below normal levels, but not as low as those advocating a boycott had
hoped. Nor is the result decisive enough for conservatives to claim
a strong popular mandate, but that is unlikely to stop the unelected
religious establishment suppressing demands for change.
President Mohammad
Khatami now faces a final year in office without the support of a reformist
Majlis. When he cast his vote on Friday, for an election he had labelled
unfair, the President wore a telling frown and was rumoured to have
written down only a few names out of the 30 allowed for each voter.
With Friday's result
a foregone conclusion after the disqualification of more than 2,300
reformist candidates, the election was all about turnout. Early results
suggested participation of a little under 50 per cent, dropping to 30
per cent in Tehran. "Voting will not make any difference in people's
lives, it is all just a game. The reformists just let people think things
were improving, without making any real changes," said Khorram,
a shopkeeper in Tehran.
Many going to the
polls expressed cynicism about the process, and said they only wanted
to get the mark in their identity cards showing they had voted. Reformists
allege rumours were deliberately spread to suggest that people who failed
to vote might have problems with bureaucracy. They say the level of
spoiled ballots is likely to top 10 per cent, and that many votes were
cast at random. That could lead to a second round of polling in some
cities in a couple of months.
Although the conservatives
are now in the ascendant, they are deeply divided over how to proceed,
with pragmatists favouring a softer "bread and circuses" approach
to rule and hardliners wanting revenge on their reformist enemies. Hojjatolislam
Qavami, one of the disqualified MPs and chairman of the Majlis legal
committee, told The Independent on Sunday the opponents of reform could
become "Taliban-like and limit all legal freedom". Some reformists
actually hope for a crackdown in the belief that this might rekindle
public support for them.
So far hardliners
seem to be setting the agenda. But now they will need to focus on improving
the economy as a pivotal element of their strategy to retain power.
Economic reform has been severely hindered by constant bickering between
the Majlis and non-elected conservatives in recent years, and can now
be pushed through more quickly.