UN: An Instrument Of Terror
By Ghali Hassan
20 August, 2007
On 10 August 2007, the United
Nations Security Council has voted to give the UN an “extended
role” in U.S.-British occupied Iraq after more than four years
in which the UN was ignored and considered irrelevant by the U.S. and
its few willing allies. The new UN Resolution, sponsored (as usual)
by the U.S. and Britain, is a propaganda designed to manipulate the
public and legitimise ongoing U.S.-British terror in Iraq.
Promoted by Western media
and think-tanks as the face of the “International Community”,
the UN is a façade used to justify and cover-up U.S. and Western-sponsored
war crimes and terrorism. It is a façade legitimising U.S. imperialist
agenda at the expense of the Iraqi people. The UN history of complicity
in Western-sponsored war crimes is very long and treacherous; therefore
it is not the subject of this short essay. Iraq is just a case in point.
Describing the role of the
UN and its importance to the U.S., Kim R. Holmes, U.S. Assistant Secretary
for International Organization Affairs told the Baltimore Council on
Foreign Affairs: “dealing as I do with the UN every day, that
President Bush believes the UN is still a vital institution. It is an
important tool of U.S. foreign policy”. Every U.S. government
has brushed the UN aside whenever it was in the U.S. interest to do
Typically, the U.S. would block any resolution that is slightly critical
of U.S.-Israel policies by way of coercing and buying (bribing) the
other members. If this doesn’t work, the U.S. is well-known for
its veto power and has done so very often, especially when Israel’s
terror and war crimes in the Middle East at stake.
Since 1990, the UN played
a complicit and active role in U.S. and Britain war crimes against the
Iraqi people. The UN Security Council is directly responsible for the
needless killings of more than 1.6 million innocent Iraqi civilians,
including at least 600,000 children under the age of five. “It
was known to all members of the Security Council that the linkage between
disarmament and comprehensive economic sanctions meant that the people
of Iraq were made to pay a heavy price in terms of life and destitution
for acts of their government. It was known to all members of the Security
Council that the inadequacy of the Council's allocations for the oil-for-food
programme and the bureaucracy with which this humanitarian exemption
was implemented worsened the chances of survival of many Iraqis”,
said Hans von Sponeck, former UN's Assistant Secretary-General and UN
Humanitarian Co-ordinator for Iraq who resigned in 2000 in protest of
the Iraq Genocide.
It is important to add that
while innocent Iraqi civilians were dying en mass, many UN member states
– particularly Australia, Britain and the U.S. who advocated the
Genocide – and UN bureaucrats were enriching themselves through
It was also known to all
members of the Security Council that Iraq was disarmed and there were
no weapons of mass destruction. The so-called “disarmament”
was merely a pretext for the 2003 war of aggression, “the ‘supreme
international crime’, which differs from other war crimes in that
it encompasses all the evil that follows”.
In 2003, while UN Security
Council disapproved the illegal invasion of Iraq, its approval of Resolution
1441 paved the way for the unprovoked murderous act of aggression. Subsequently,
in May 2003, the UN legitimated the murderous Occupation of Iraq by
recognising the U.S. and Britain as the “occupying powers”,
and effectively authorised U.S. “counter-insurgency” (anti-Resistance)
war in Iraq. Contrast this with the UN position on Iraq in 1990-1991
when Iraq took military action against Kuwait violations of Iraqi sovereignty.
Watching an important UN
member state destroyed, the UN rewarded the U.S.-British aggressors
the right to loot Iraq’s financial reserve and Iraq’s oil
wealth by transferring all of Iraq’s wealth, including Iraq’s
oil export revenues, all funds left over from the UN’s “oil
for food” program, and all assets of the former Iraqi government
located anywhere in the world into a U.S.-controlled “Development
Fund for Iraq” account. The UN not only violated its own Charter,
it has deliberately violated the human rights of all Iraqis.
Since the 2003 illegal invasion,
“there has not been a debate in the Security Council about the
fundamental disregard by the [occupying] forces of existing conventions
created to ensure that the occupation armies act in accordance with
The Hague and The Geneva Conventions to which they are parties. Looting
and burning of the national museum and the national library, the damaging
of archaeological sites and the humiliating treatment of civilians by
the US armed forces, provoked no protest in the Security Council. The
Security Council watched impotently when the soul and ethos of Iraq
was attacked. The detention of political figures for indefinite periods
and the unimaginable brutality and sadism with which detainees were
treated not just in Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca but also in [countless]
prisons [throughout Iraq] were not subject of Security Council concern.
Carpet destruction [include intensive air and ground bombardment and
cutting off electricity, water, food and medicines] of towns such as
al-Fallujah, Tel Afar, Samarra, and al-Qaim did not ruffle the Security
Council and lead to emergency meetings”, added von Sponeck.
At least one million Iraqi civilians have been killed, and an estimated
4.5 million Iraqis, half of them children (according to UN Children’s
Fund), have fled their homes; including a mass exodus of at least 50,000
Iraqis flee their country every month. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
citizens are illegally imprisoned without charge or trial, in direct
violation of international law. They are tortured, abused and denied
basic human rights under deplorable conditions. Despite all of this,
the UN Security Council remains silent. The failure to condemn these
war crimes proves the complicity and moral bankruptcy of all members
of the UN Security Council. Yet the UN Security Council is more concerned
about the regional conflict in Darfur (Sudan) than the much larger atrocity
It is worth noting that the current U.S.-Zionist agenda is the control
of Iraq’s oil wealth. It is possible that the new UN role in Iraq
affairs is to facilitate the passing of the so-called “Oil Law”
– drafted and made a priority by the Bush Administration –
and to help the Bush Administration with its September “Benchmarks”.
The UN presence will allow the Bush Administration to claim “satisfactory
progress” in Iraq, if the Oil Law passed at the expense of the
Iraqi people. A poll carried out in June and July by KA Research in
Iraqis in all 18 Iraqi provinces, and coordinated and analysed by Custom
Strategic Research on behalf of a group of NGOs, revealed that the overwhelming
majority of Iraqis are united against the Oil Law. The Law will give
Western, mostly U.S. corporations, total control over Iraq’s oil
wealth. Oil experts around the world have criticised the Oil Law and
insisted that Iraq has enough quality oil engineers and doesn’t
need a Law that would pay as much as 12 per cent profit margin to Iraq
when oil prices are very high.
Furthermore, all members
of the UN Security Council are aware that the overwhelming majority
of Iraqis are against the Occupation and want an immediate withdrawal
of U.S. forces and foreign mercenaries from Iraq, saying that their
swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decreases political
violence. (Amit R. Paley, Washington Post, September 27, 2006).
It is naïve and grossly
ignorant to suggest that the UN new role in U.S.-British occupied Iraq
is anything other than an active complicity in Iraq Genocide. The wanton
destruction of Iraq, the looting of Iraq’s wealth and cultural
heritage, the mass murder of innocent Iraqi civilians and the ongoing
suffering of the Iraqi people under the radar screen of the UN is evidence
that the UN is an instrument of U.S. foreign policy. It provides a fig
leaf for U.S. wars of aggression and terrorism.
The new UN Resolution and
the recent face-saving empty statements by the UN about it new role
in Iraq are designed to deceive and manipulate the public. “All
[the UN's] Resolutions and its presence are not worth the paper they
are written on”, an Iraqi resident told the BBC. They are only
a record of UN complicity in Western-sponsored war crimes.
In summary, it is no good
if the UN presence in Iraq will provide the U.S. a face-saving way out.
If the UN is serious about protecting its own Charter and credibility,
the UN must: (1) end its complicity in Western-sponsored war crimes
and reject U.S. domination and bullying tactics; (2) recognise the Iraqi
National Resistance against the Occupation; (3) respect the wishes of
the overwhelming majority of the Iraqi people by unconditionally supporting
their struggle to end the murderous Occupation in order to preserve
their Iraqi national identity and independence; and (4) demand that
the U.S. and Britain pay war reparations to Iraq in the same way Iraq
was forced to pay massive war reparations to Kuwait.
Ghali Hassan is an independent
writer living in Australia.
“War and Occupation
in Iraq”. Global Policy Forum, June 2007.
Share Your Insights
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.