Away
With 'Sacred Pollution
By Subhash Gatade
04 September, 2006
Countercurrents.org
It
was the beginning of the month of August when Hyderabad witnessed a
heated debate over immersion of Ganesh idols in Hussain Sagar.The city
happens to be second only to Mumbai in organising the festival on a
massive scale where more than 15,000 huge idols are normally installed
at various places. In fact the debate was precipitated by a decision
of the highcourts which had asked different departments to make alternate
arrangements for idol immersion. The highcourt was responding to a petition
before it which had provided details about the pollution caused by this
yearly ritual. The advocate general of the state had also made a presentation
before the courts which also elaborated upon the way idol immersion
adds to the level of water pollution ( Hindi Milap, 5th August 2006,
Hyderabad).
Taking umbrage at this order
a section of the citizenry, which saw enough participation of Hindutva
brigade leaders in it, flatly denied that idols cause any type of pollution
and asked the state government to intervene to protect the 'religious
rights of Hindus'. As of now immersion in the Hussain Sagar will be
taking place under strict monitoring by state authorities as the Andhra
Pradesh High Court has issued orders to minimise pollution.
One does not know when state
leaders of the Hindutva brigade - namely BJP or VHP - had raised a hue
and cry over this issue, they had any knowledge about the way their
counterparts in Gujarat were contemplating a plan to control the pollution
caused by the same. If the high court in AP had asked to merely to make
alternate arrangements for idol immersion, the guidelines issued by
the Gujarat state government had asked that idols should be made of
clay and no synthetic colours be used to make them. These guidelines
were necessiated taking into consideration the way thousands of Ganesha
idols are immersed in Kankaria Lake in Ahmedabad, Sursagar Lake in Baroda
and the Sabarmati river.In a newsitem 'Gujarat' bid for Clean Ganesh'
which appeared on BBC news:
The new guidelines, originally
prepared by India’s Central Pollution Control Board and reproduced
by its Gujarat state counterpart, have been sent to district officials
for implementation. From now on Ganesha idols should be made of clay
and not of plaster of Paris - a fine white chemical powder which solidifies
when mixed with water. Environmentalists say plaster of Paris takes
longer to dissolve; it also reduces the oxygen level in the water resulting
in the death of a large number of fish. Clay, on the other hand, dissolves
quickly and does not harm aquatic life. The pollution control board
has also appealed to the organisers of the festival to commission smaller
idols which dissolve more easily in water. (www.bbc.co.uk, : Monday,
21 August 2006, 14:53 GMT 15:53 UK )
The raging debate over idol
immersion reminded one about a tragic scence on the Juhu beach,Bombay
last year. The sudden appearance of thousands of dead fishes - small
as well as big - had made policy makers as well as citizenry sit up
and wonder what precipitated this phenomenon. When asked to divulge
the possible reasons the officials of the fisheries department had made
a few general comments focussing around increased pollution of water
leading to such deaths. But nobody was ready to tell that the immediate
reason for the increase in level of pollution had something to do with
the immersion of idols in their thousands in the month of september
followed by October.A electronic channel (NDTV) continued to followup
the particular story and investigated into the quality of sea water
at various places.It found to its dismay that the sea water has turned
poisonous at different places because of dissolved mercury and other
heavy metals.
One can understand why two
years back the Chennai highcourt had imposed a temporary ban on immersion
of idols of Ganesh. The court upheld a petition which said the idols
are made of chemicals which pollute the sea and other water sources.
(www.bbc.co.uk ,Wednesday, 8 September, 2004, 18:30 GMT 19:30 UK).The
court had also issued notices to the state government and the Pollution
Control Board to explain their stand on this issue.
A study of the pollution
levels of Yamuna river in September done by the ‘Central Pollution
Control Board’( Indian Express 13 September 2005) had similarly
thrown light on this phenomenon which had clearly underlined how immersion
increases quantity of metals and decreases dissolved oxygen in the river
and thus leads to choking of the river. It was observed that while mercury
concentration in the river is nil in normal period, it goes up in the
festive season after the idol immersion. The way people dispose of flowers,
plastics, ashes in the river also adds to the pollution levels. The
CPCB tells us that the capital witnesses every year around 1700 immersions
and looking at the enormous popularity of Ganesh festival in many parts
of India one can imagine the enormity of the pollution caused because
of this yearly ritual.
Definitely the immersion
of idols causing irreparable damage to the environment is not the only
example which demonstrate how rituals of a section of people can become
nuisance of sorts for the wider populace or for that matter the ecosystem
itself. May it be mass deaths of fishes or the incovenience caused to
the broader public because of holding of religious processions every
other day or for that matter holding of namaaz prayers on the street
itself to accomodate a large gathering or the sprouting up of ‘ancient’
temples on busy thoroughfares or colonies one can vouchsafe that faith
of a section of the people is not neutral as it is presented to be.
While the onset of communal riots on some minor pretext could be said
to be the extreme manifestation of this phenomenon the non riot like
situation which othewise exists is not a guarantee that everything is
normal at the societal level.
It is clear that the makers
of constitution who had rightly added freedom of faith including its
propagation as one of the cardinal principles of the democratic experiment
could not have envisaged this state of affairs. Looking at the state
of affairs and the possibility of mischievous elements benefitting from
it, is it not high time that saner elements in society come together
to envisage plans so that faith practised by a section of the society
should not become an alibi for harming the larger lifeworld around us.