Attack
On Taslima:Love Of Islam
Or Love Of Power?
By Asghar Ali Engineer
14 August, 2007
Countercurrents.org
It
was shocking that three MLAs of Ittahidul Muslimin in Hyderabad gatecrashed
into the book release function of her book Lajjai translated into Telugu
on 9th August and tried to beat up Taslima and shouted slogans using
unbecoming words, even using abusing language. And all this in the name
of Islam as if Islam stands for such hooliganism.
The party leadership instead
of condemning such wayward behaviour, approved of it and patted them
on back. They were even given hero's welcome. One MLA even said that
if Taslima comes to Hyderabad again, she will be beheaded. If elected
representatives take law into their own hands, there cannot be greater
tragedy. If they had done it without invoking Islam, it would have been
a different story, though equally condemnable.
Was this for love of Islam?
No way. It was love of power, pure and simple. The Party leadership
thought it is good opportunity to strengthen and widen its electoral
base. Human behaviour, especially political behaviour is extremely complex.
Politicians, while acting in self-interest, invoke high ideals in order
to cover up their utterly selfish motives.
Someone Imam even declared
from Calcutta that he would pay Rs.50,000/- if anyone blackens Taslima's
face. An Imam is supposed to be very respectable and responsible person
who leads people in namaz (prayer) but also leads them in social and
political matters. An Imam's behaviour should be highly restrained and
responsible. I totally disagree with Taslima's views and think she is
completely ignorant about Qur'anic teachings but that does not give
anyone right to violently attack her or incite people to attack her.
Apart from the fact that
such hooliganism is morally reprehensible it is unwise from the viewpoint
of those who are opposed to Taslima's attacks on Islam.
This gives her much more publicity that she deserves. Now this attack
that took place in Hyderabad will give her worldwide publicity on one
hand, and would make her celebrity in the eyes of those who are already
hostile to Islam. Now reams and reams of papers will be blackened in
her praise.
She would also be now much
more hostile to Islam than ever before. She would really hate Islam
because of hooliganism of some members of Ittihadul Muslimin. If we
really love Islam than we should try to win her heart and soul through
love and compassion. And that is what the Prophet of Islam did. It is
well known story that a Jewish woman who hated the Prophet (PBUH) used
to throw garbage on him whenever he passed from below her house. Once
when she did not throw garbage on him, he inquired why she did not and
was told she is sick. He immediately went to inquire about her health.
She was so moved that immediately accepted Islam then and there.
What a contrast! Those who
claim to love Prophet and Islam are attacking a woman and making her
hate Islam more than before. This is madness, not wise behaviour and
must be condemned as strongly as possible. These MLAs and crowd accompanied
them have brought utter shame to Islam and Muslims. It is heartening
that many religious leaders of Muslims and intellectuals have condemned
it. Maulana Mustaqim of Jamiat –ul-Ulama-i-Hind, Shiah leader
Maulana Ather Abbas Rizvi and several others have strongly condemned
attack on Taslima Nasreen.
The book which was being
released in Hyderabad had nothing to do with Islam. It was Telugu translation
of her book on persecution of Hindu minority in Bangla Desh. After demolition
of Babri Masjid like hooligans of Hindutva attacked Muslims all over
India and engineered communal violence in number of cities and killed
Muslims, the hooligans of Jamat-e-Islami of Bangla Desh attacked Hindus
and demolished their temples and set fire to their houses. In Lajja
(shame) she has condemned all this. Do we Muslims not heave sigh of
relief when some fair-minded Hindus stand by Muslims when Hindu communal
forces attack us? Should we not stand by fair-minded Muslims of Bangla
Desh if they stand by Hindu minority?
It is true Taslima has written
provocative articles on Islam. We must counter it by arguing on the
basis of Qur'an rather than attacking her physically, and in very dignified
language befitting a true Muslim. No one can cite a single verse of
Qur'an or any hadith to support violence against others, even enemies,
as long as they are peaceful. On the other hand we can cite several
verses from the Qur'an, to support dignified behaviour.
The Qur'an says, " Call
to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and goodly exhortation, and argue
with them in the best manner" (16:125). Again what a contrast –the
hooligans of Ittihadul Muslimin beat up a woman and other journalists
and others present there. Also, Allah says in the Qur'an "..do
not be aggressors, Allah does not love aggressors." (2:190). And
even if a Muslim renounces Islam and becomes unbeliever, no one has
right to punish him/her except Allah.
"Those who believe",
says Qur'an, "then disbelieve, again believe and again disbelieve,
then increase in disbelief, Allah is not referring to any punishment
for those who repeatedly believe and disbelieve and increase in disbelief,
let alone human beings punishing them of their own. Even if Taslima
has ceased to believe and has increased in her disbelief, no one has
any right among human beings to punish her. It is matter of her conscience.
All one can do is to dialogue with her in dignified way and then leave
it to her conscience
II
Democracies in socially backward
countries like India face an acute dilemma. The entire functioning of
democracy depends on rights of people and freedom of conscience and
right to believe or disbelieve. Both individual and collective rights
are sacred in democracy. However, politicians greedy for votes of illiterate
masses, and even educated middle class people, try to incite religious
feelings and get their votes. Most of the politicians find this easy
way to legislative assemblies or Parliament. They emerge as champions
of this or that religion and grab their votes.
This is what the Sangh Parivar
did by launching an aggressive movement for Ramjanambhoomi and demolished
Babri Masjid and took pride in that act of lawlessness and destruction.
The Sangh leaders launched not only aggressive campaign but Sangh leaders
like Uma Bharti and Sadhvi Rithambara used abusive language against
Muslims and the Government did nothing. They allowed hate campaign to
go on.
If the authorities had taken
stiff action against Uma Bharti and Rithambara, it would have sent a
strong signal to all others that they cannot get away with such aggressive
campaigns against all norms of democracy. Democracy cannot succeed without
following rule of law. If Uma Bharti and Rithambara had been punished,
MLAs of Ittihadul Muslimin would not have dared to indulge in this hooliganism.
However, as the Swedish scholar
who wrote Asian Drama observed India's is the soft government and refuses
to act until all damage is done. Taslima Nasreen's attackers also got
away with symbolic arrest and were released on bail immediately thereafter.
It speaks volumes about our indifferent approach and also fear of votes.
So many communal riots take
place because no guilty in the riots is ever punished. All of them know
this and have nothing to care for consequences. And riots keep on taking
place. Mumbai riots more than 800 persons were killed, many of them
most brutally, and yet state is extremely reluctant to act lest Shiv
Sena may not approve of it. Can this ever be the reason for not acting
at all for a democratic government?
This is indeed bad omen for
Indian democracy. The people involved in such public crimes must be
severely punished to send strong message that hooliganism will not be
tolerated in any case. Rule of law must be applied under any circumstances.
Politicians should not be allowed to incite people publicly to indulge
in mayhem and murder. This is repeatedly happening in our democracy.
It is heartening sign that
many religious personalities among Muslims and secular intellectuals
among them have come out strongly condemning this attack on Taslima
Nasreen. Still many columnists, even waiting for a day started demanding
where are those Muslims and secularists who immediately condemn Hindutvawadis
but keep quiet when some Muslim fanatics indulge in such extremist action.
Many such columnists will come out with many such articles and further
aggravate feelings in majority community.
We are not a mature democracy
and should come out against any act of hooliganism and violence whosoever
perpetrates it, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs or Christians. We must promote
zero tolerance towards any act of violence. It should be our litmus
test. If we want to enjoy fruits of secular democracy we must shed all
forms of partisan feelings. Politicisation of religion in our democracy
has already done enough damage. How much more damage we want to inflict?
Is any one listening?
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.