Home

Follow Countercurrents on Twitter 

Why Subscribe ?

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

Editor's Picks

Press Releases

Action Alert

Feed Burner

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Bradley Manning

India Burning

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis

Iraq

AfPak War

Peak Oil

Globalisation

Localism

Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

Kandhamal Violence

WSF

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

About CC

Disclaimer

Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Search Our Archive

Subscribe To Our
News Letter



Our Site

Web

Name: E-mail:

 

Printer Friendly Version

The "Salwa Judum" Question

By Campaign for Survival and Dignity

11 July, 2011
Countercurrents.org

Last Tuesday (July 5th) the Supreme Court, in a historic and welcome judgment, disallowed the use of Special Police Officers in the "counterinsurgency" campaign against the CPI(Maoist). Sections of the media have largely focused on the supposed impact this will have on the security forces. The reality is that the Supreme Court has simply upheld the basic norms that a democratic country is supposed to follow - but that our government has never followed.

In the extreme focus on the "security" angle, many seem to have forgotten the horrific atrocities committed by these forces and the "salwa judum" militia to which they belonged. Like private armies and militias in all civil wars, the Chhattisgarh government created salwa judum to do the kind of barbaric crimes that the official forces do not want to be seen doing. This included the burning and emptying of 644 villages, as per official figures; the driving of more than 2 lakh people from their homes in a "scorched earth" policy; and killings and gangrapes on a mass scale.

It is worth remembering that, in international law, such atrocities are classified as crimes against humanity. War crimes indictments have been framed against those responsible for lesser atrocities. Yet in the "world's largest democracy", it took four years for our highest court to halt such horrors, and then we are told that this is "a blow to anti Naxal operations."

Meanwhile, even as the rhetoric of "rule of law" is used by both Central and State governments to justify this kind of inhuman brutality, the very same governments continue to engage in a illegal resource grab with the same rapacity as before. It is not an exaggeration to say that this has become nothing less than a criminal state. And it is hence no surprise that it wants to retain SPOs, the mafia arm of its security forces, to carry on with the atrocities which it sees as necessary for its activities. If indeed the Centre or the Chhattisgarh government approach the Supreme Court for a review of this judgment, it will only expose them as criminals before the nation.

Campaign for Survival and Dignity
www.forestrightsact.com



 


Comments are not moderated. Please be responsible and civil in your postings and stay within the topic discussed in the article too. If you find inappropriate comments, just Flag (Report) them and they will move into moderation que.