Iraq’s
“stable” South Descends Into Political Chaos
By James Cogan
04 May, 2007
World
Socialist Web
A
power struggle between rival Shiite parties in Iraq’s oil-rich
southern province of Basra is escalating toward open warfare and looming
as a major crisis for the US-led occupation and the British government
in particular. There are still some 7,000 British troops in southern
Iraq, who will inevitably be called upon to suppress any large-scale
violence.
On April 28, the provincial
parliament voted 27-12 to remove the governor, Mohammed al-Waili, one
of the most senior figures in the mainly Basra-based Islamic Virtue
Party or Al Fadhila. Constitutionally, a two-thirds majority is required
to unseat a governor. Fadhila says Waili’s opponents require a
minimum of 28 votes, because the parliament has 41 seats. The factions
seeking to remove him—a coalition known as the Basra Islamic Front—claim
to have met the two-thirds requirement as two legislators have resigned
from the assembly.
A standoff has ensued since.
A proposal by Fadhila to accept Waili’s removal provided he was
replaced with another of the movement’s leaders has reportedly
been rejected. Following the vote, the Iraqi newspaper Azzaman reported,
“rival factions ... have mobilised their armed militias for what
many residents expect to be a ferocious fight over control of the provincial
council.” Azzaman said the Basra Islamic Front had deployed 7,000
armed men into the city, while Fadhila supporters and loyalist police
had surrounded the governor’s headquarters.
“As armed groups fortify
positions in major streets and amid heavily populated areas, the occupying
British troops charged with security have so far shown little concern,”
the newspaper commented.
A great deal is at stake
in the power struggle. The bulk of Iraq’s southern oil fields
and untapped reserves lie within Basra province, as does the country’s
only access to the Persian Gulf and its major ports. Basra itself is
Iraq’s second largest city, with a predominantly Shiite Arab population
of more than two million.
Fadhila is the party of the
Basra establishment and local Shiite tribes, who have longstanding involvement
in Iraq’s oil industry. Waili, the governor, comes from a family
of wealthy oil traders. The management of the Southern Oil Company is
connected with the party, as is the leadership of the powerful oil industry
trade unions.
From the time of the US invasion,
Fadhila worked to ensure that the local Basra elite would be the primary
beneficiaries of greater oil exports and inflows of foreign investment.
It accommodated to the British occupation forces, manoeuvred to take
control of the governorship and sought to fill the provincial security
forces with its loyalists. The 25,000-strong “Oil Protection Force,”
which was assembled with British assistance and guards Basra’s
oil fields, refineries, pipelines and port facilities, is believed to
have been largely recruited from Fadhila militiamen.
While separatism is not part
of its official policy, Fadhila’s upper echelon does include individuals
who want to transform Basra into an autonomous region, like the northern
Kurdish provinces. Under the country’s US-drafted constitution,
a region can exert control over all new oil production within its borders.
A senior party leader, Aqeel Talib, told the New York Times last June:
“We as Fadhila want to make our province our own region. We have
two million people, an airport, a port and oil—everything we need
to be a state.”
Such plans, however, are
anathema to Shiite parties such as the Iranian-linked Supreme Council
for the Islamic Revolution (SCIRI) and the movement headed by cleric
Moqtada al-Sadr. Both are seeking to dislodge Fadhila from power.
SCIRI, which politically
dominates most of southern Iraq, advocates Basra’s oil be placed
under the control of a super-Shiite region, including all nine predominantly
Shiite southern provinces. Among Fadhila’s supporters, this proposal
is viewed as a grab by the Shiite political and clerical establishment
based in the energy-poor cities of Najaf and Karbala to lay their hands
on a greater share of Basra oil.
The Sadrists and Fadhila
have a common origin in the fundamentalist movement led by Moqtada al-Sadr’s
uncle and father, both of whom were assassinated by Saddam Hussein’s
regime. Both demagogically espouse Iraqi nationalism, oppose the US-British
occupation and accuse SCIRI of being too close to the Iran. On the issue
of regionalism, however, the two have become bitter enemies.
The Sadrists, who control
most of the Shiite districts of Baghdad, oppose any form of federalism
that weakens the central government’s authority over Iraq’s
oil. From the standpoint of the Shiite elite in Iraq’s capital,
the partition of the country into an autonomous Kurdish north and Shiite
south would leave the centre starved of resources.
More immediately, all the
political factions in Basra—whether with the knowledge of their
top leadership or not—are fighting for control of the lucrative
oil smuggling rackets that operate from the city. Mowaffak al-Rubaie,
a national security adviser for the Iraqi government, told the New York
Times last June: “If you don’t understand what’s happening
there, follow the dollar sign. There is a 6,000-barrel-per-day difference
between the level of production for export and the level of actual export.
It goes into the pockets of these warlords, militias, organised crime,
[and] political parties.”
As British forces have steadily
withdrawn and “handed over” more of southern Iraq to local
Iraqi authorities, an increasingly bloody intra-Shiite conflict has
developed. The British now have just two bases in Basra, at the airport
and one of Saddam Hussein’s former presidential palaces. Fadhila,
SCIRI and Sadrist militia have all been accused of assassinations and
violence in what is commonly described as a mafia-style turf war.
In March, the escalating
Shiite divisions led Fadhila’s 15 members in the national parliament
to walk out of the United Iraqi Alliance—the Shiite coalition
that won the largest bloc of seats in the December 2005 elections and
dominates the Baghdad government. The Sadrist movement then walked out
of the cabinet of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in April, denouncing
SCIRI and Maliki’s Da’awa Party for refusing to demand a
timetable for the withdrawal of US forces. Demonstrating his growing
support, Sadr called a demonstration of close to one million people
on April 9 in Najaf—supposedly the stronghold of SCIRI and Da’awa.
The Sadrist movement also
appears to be gaining influence in Basra, where it has agitated among
the huge numbers of urban poor over their catastrophic living conditions.
UN refugee agency, UNHCR, reported in June 2006 that the province has
60 percent unemployment, severe water and electricity shortages, rampant
disease and malnutrition, a crisis-stricken health and education system
and widespread homelessness. The Sadrists are blaming both the US-British
occupation and Fadhila corruption.
Over the past two years,
Waili, the Fadhila governor, has sought to retain support by adapting
to the popular hatred of the British. On two occasions, he has ordered
his administration to temporarily cease all cooperation with the occupation.
The first followed a raid by British troops on an Iraqi police prison
in September 2005 to free SAS personnel who had been detained by local
police after they were discovered dressed as Arabs and in possession
of explosives. The second followed the British killing of five Iraqis
who had gathered to celebrate the crash of a helicopter in May 2006.
Fadhila’s efforts to
appease the Basra masses have largely failed however. Waili’s
government is widely viewed as a puppet of the foreign forces. An armed
clash took place on March 22, when Sadrist militiamen were fired on
after they approached Fadhila’s headquarters and the governor’s
personal residence to protest against the appalling state of electricity
supply. Thousands of Basra residents carrying portraits of Moqtada al-Sadr
demonstrated outside the governor’s office again in mid-April,
demanding the resignation of Waili over the catastrophic conditions
in the city. One of the protest’s main banners read: “We
reject any corrupt despot who disrespects the masses.” An oil
worker told Agence France Presse the governor was “a misfit”.
Armed resistance to the British
military in southern Iraq is also steadily increasing. A British soldier,
who recently returned from Basra, broke ranks in April and revealed
the extent of the attacks on British forces in Basra. Private Paul Barton
told his local Tamworth Herald that while his battalion had lost only
one dead, 33 others had been wounded. “We were losing people and
didn’t have enough to replace them.... On the last tour we were
not mortared very often. This tour, it was two or three times a day,”
he said.
“Toward the end of
January to March, it was like a siege mentality. We were getting mortared
every hour of the day. We were constantly being fired at. We basically
didn’t sleep for six months.... Every patrol we went on we were
either shot at or blown up by roadside bombs. It was crazy.”
Barton concluded: “Basra
is lost. They are in control now. It’s a full-scale riot and the
government is just trying to save face.”
By February, British troops
were being attacked 90 times per day, compared with an average of 20
a year earlier. The British force in Iraq suffered 11 dead in April—the
largest number of any month since the fall of Baghdad in April 2003.
With anti-occupation sentiment and political tensions rising in Basra
and the surrounding provinces, casualties are likely to soar further.
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.
Click
here to comment
on this article