Home

Follow Countercurrents on Twitter 

Google+ 

Support Us

Popularise CC

Join News Letter

CounterSolutions

CounterImages

CounterVideos

Editor's Picks

Press Releases

Action Alert

Feed Burner

Read CC In Your
Own Language

Bradley Manning

India Burning

Mumbai Terror

Financial Crisis

Iraq

AfPak War

Peak Oil

Globalisation

Localism

Alternative Energy

Climate Change

US Imperialism

US Elections

Palestine

Latin America

Communalism

Gender/Feminism

Dalit

Humanrights

Economy

India-pakistan

Kashmir

Environment

Book Review

Gujarat Pogrom

Kandhamal Violence

Arts/Culture

India Elections

Archives

Links

Submission Policy

About Us

Disclaimer

Fair Use Notice

Contact Us

Search Our Archive

 



Our Site

Web

Subscribe To Our
News Letter

Name: E-mail:

 

Printer Friendly Version

Syria In Israeli PM’s Agenda While The Interventionists Live In A Divided House

By Countercurrents.org

11 February, 2013
Countercurrents.org

Syria is top on the agenda of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu while the Syrian interventionists appear divided. These make the Syria scene more complex.

A Jerusalem datelined Reuters report said:

Iran's nuclear ambitions, the civil war in Syria and stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts will top the agenda of US president Barack Obama's visit to Israel, said Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on February 10, 2013 [1].

The White House announced that Obama plans to visit Israel.

In public remarks at the cabinet session, Netanyahu put Iran at the top of his list of talking points with Obama and referred only in general terms to peace efforts with the Palestinians, stopping short of setting a revival of bilateral negotiations as a specific goal of the visit.

"The president and I spoke about this visit and agreed that we would discuss three main issues ... Iran's attempt to arm itself with nuclear weapons, the unstable situation in Syria ... and the efforts to advance the diplomatic process of peace between the Palestinians and us," Netanyahu said.

Obama and Netanyahu discussed the coming trip in a January 28 telephone call.

The visit will take place only after Netanyahu puts together a new governing coalition following his narrower-than-expected victory in Israel's January 22 election.

Netanyahu, who heads the right-wing Likud party, has begun talks with prospective political partners and still has up to five weeks to complete the process.

Citing the dangers Israel faces from the "earthquake that is happening around us", a reference to Arab upheaval in the region and the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, Netanyahu said Obama's visit now was particularly important.

A divided house

Ian Black, Middle East editor, the Guardian, said [2]:

Bashar al-Assad, it sometimes seems, is lucky in his enemies. Controversy and bitter recriminations have been raging in their ranks since the leader of the Syrian opposition coalition (SOC), Moaz al-Khatib, dropped a bombshell by offering talks with Assad's vice-president, Farouq al-Sharaa.

And now confirmation that the White House vetoed Pentagon plans to arm the anti-Assad rebels has underlined just how hard it has been for them to translate political support from the west into practical assistance to achieve victory.

Khatib said he would negotiate with Sharaa if 160,000 prisoners were freed and passports issued for Syrians abroad. But outrage erupted because the SOC's charter states that it will not talk to the regime – except about its departure.

Khatib retorted that he was expressing a personal view, but then met the foreign ministers of Russia and Iran, Assad's main backers.

Now, after a flurry of tense consultations, Khatib and colleagues will meet in Cairo this weekend – with the UN envoy Lakhdar Brahimi – for an emergency session to clarify the position.

Others hailed last week's initiative as reflecting the wishes of Syrians desperate to end a war that has killed 60,000 people. Activists of some of the Local Co-ordination Committees have given their qualified support. So has a commander of the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

"Khatib's offer of talks with Assad helped undermine the terrible fear of many that this struggle is existential and will continue until one side has eliminated the other," wrote Joshua Landis on the Syria Comment blog. "To many Syrians who feel that they are mere pawns caught between two clashing giants … [it] provided some hope of a kinder and saner future."

Khatib, a former imam of the historic Umayyad mosque in Damascus, was supposed to usher in an era of unity when he became SOC president in November. The fractious Syrian National Council (SNC) was subsumed into the new body. Its performance was said by the western governments calling for Assad to go to have become more businesslike.

But the SOC is still divided into camps, like the SNC before it. "This initiative has taken us back to square one after all the efforts we made to convince the international community that the opposition was united," complained one activist. "It was handled completely unprofessionally. It was a wasted opportunity."

Kamal Labwani, an independent, warned of "betrayal" and a "fifth column" inside the opposition. "The regime understands only the language of force," he protested. But George Sabra of the SNC – the largest component of the SOC – was more nuanced: he first rejected the initiative but then softened his position, calling for unity and support for the FSA as fighters made new but probably temporary gains on the outskirts of Damascus this week.

Khatib, described as charismatic but a bad listener, is said to dislike foreign-based activists and intellectuals he considers out of touch – disparagingly known as "hotel warriors". Based in Cairo with his own loyal team, he has the support of powerful businessmen from Damascus who are alarmed by the rise of Islamist and jihadi groups in the armed opposition.

"People have criticized Khatib for naivety but there are forces telling him that this is the way to go," said commentator Malik al-Abdeh. "They tell him that if this carries on then everything they have achieved will come crashing down because of the backwoods fighters of the FSA and the jihadis who will destroy Damascus as they have large parts of Aleppo."

Others warn that Khatib's leadership, and that of the SOC, remains far more dependent on external recognition than any internal legitimacy.

The US, Britain and the EU gave Khatib's initiative a cautious welcome while insisting Assad must be held accountable for his crimes – a position that is unlikely to persuade him to step down voluntarily. Only Turkey publicly rejected it.

"We are positive but it would be useful to tie it into other diplomatic efforts," said one western official. Hopes are focusing on Khatib's visit to Moscow next month – and for a shift in Russia's stubbornly pro-Assad position at the UN.

Still, some opposition figures fear foreign pressure to cut a deal. "Lots of friendly countries or those who claim friendship for the Syrian people were waiting for this exact kind of initiative to justify their failure to deliver on military support for the revolt and the protection of civilians," warned Burhan Ghalioun, a former SNC president.

In one sense the whole dispute is a theoretical one since the official Syrian media dismissed Khatib's offer as "political manoeuvring" while Assad himself has said nothing. It still looks as if fighting, not impassioned debates and diplomatic initiatives launched in foreign capitals, will decide the course of this war as it nears its grim second anniversary.

Islamists-liberals tussle

A Beirut datelined Reuters report [3] said:

Rebel Islamists and liberal protesters scuffled at a Syrian rally on February 8, 2013, in a sign of the divisions in the movement trying to overthrow president Assad.

The confrontation, caught on video, outraged activists calling for a secular state, who said it highlighted their fears that the 22-month-old uprising against Assad is being taken over by religious hardliners.

"This is what we are scared of, we fear that this kind of fighting will happen when the regime is gone," said a moderate Islamist activist called Wessam in Damascus, one of many who rushed to protest on Syrian revolutionary websites. Similar confrontations have occurred before but Friday's appeared to be the first of which film has become widely available.

The video footage shows marchers in the northern town of Saraqeb. Some are waving the rebel green, white and black flag which has come to symbolize the general revolt against Assad and some the black banners of the Islamists. After an argument, a rebel flag is grabbed and the flagpole broken. A second is seized and thrown aside. The march continues, with rebel and Islamist flags still mingled.

But the secular slogan of protesters: "One, One, One; The Syrian People are One" - which echoed nationwide in the early days of the uprising - is drowned out by the chant: "The people want an Islamic Caliphate".

Islamists grew in influence as the protests against Assad developed into an armed insurgency. Islamist brigades are some of the most effective fighting forces in Syria and in many rebel-held areas Islamic sharia courts have been set up.

Activist Fadi Zaidan said secular campaigners would not surrender easily to religious zealotry, which he said was alien to most Syrians. "Just like we will defeat this murderous regime and the oppression, we will defeat those who carry the imported flags, this is the revolution flag which many sacrificed with their blood to keep flying," he said.

Source:

[1] Feb 10, 2013, “Netanyahu to discuss Iran, Syria, Palestinians with Obama”,
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/10/us-israel-usa-idUSBRE91903M20130210

[2] guardian.co.uk, Feb 8, 2013, “Divided Syrian opposition ponders leader's offer of talks with Assad”,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/08/syrian-opposition-rows-talks-assad

[3] Feb 8, 2013, “Syrian Islamists and liberals tussle at anti-Assad rally”,
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/08/us-syria-crisis-flag-idUSBRE9170S020130208

 

 




 

 


Comments are moderated