The
Argentine Autonomist Movement
And The Elections
By
Graciela Monteagudo
Znet
24 May, 2003
The Argentine social movements
are at once young and old. They were born in 1945 with the spontaneous
mass mobilization that brought Peron to power. They were also born in
1959 in Cuba. The people of those movements were disappeared, tortured,
and eventually killed from 1975 to 1982, first under a peronist government
and then under a military dictatorship. Thirty thousand people were
disappeared so that today the IMF could dictate its economic policies.
We can say, with Cesar Vallejo, that those movements were killed but
did not die. In December 2001, they took the streets with direct democracy
and direct action.
The disenchantment and rage
of those who participated on December 19th and 20th of 2001 and in the
mobilizations that followed are symptomatic of the crash of neoliberalism.
Upper and middle class folks were fed up with an economy that devoured
up their lifelong savings and rendered their streets unsafe with so
many people roaming around homeless and jobless. These were the same
folks who successfully ignored the brutal repression of the 1976 dictatorship.
They welcome the privatizations and the peso-pegged-to-the-dollar during
the Menem government. They believed they were in the first world. They
had always believed it. When all that came crashing down during the
De la Rua government, it aroused their frustration and anger with the
system. The insecurity of these times also provoked the rage of the
young, who had been excluded from the market but had not been marked
directly by the terror of the dictatorship.
As upper classes and youth
began to turn against the system, those days brought the struggle of
the unemployed families to the forefront. These people had been blockading
major highways (piquetes) in the interior of the country since mid-nineties.
They had been organizing direct actions with direct democracy. The popular
assemblies were born out of that fresh anger and rage. They also grew
from an older tradition of assemblies in the working place, in the school,
and in the colleges. The tradition can be traced to the anarchists in
the labor movement in the 20's. Their direct democracy methods also
stem from the "piquetes" in the interior of the country, such
as Cutral-Co and Salta. In the cities, the activists met middle-class
neighbors, as all banged on empty pots and pans, and passed the tradition
along. Soon many people without any experience in organizing learned
the ropes of direct democracy and used new tools to confront the economic
and social crisis that they faced.
The process highlighted by
December 19th and 20th shows us that masses of people disillusioned
by a corrupt system, using methods of direct democracy and direct action,
can put pressure on the government to produce certain changes, most
notably the lack of payment on the debt. However, at no point in this
process were the assemblies able to organize themselves as an alternative
to the centralized power of the government. Political forces operating
within the assemblies, such as the progressive peronists and leftist
political parties, made that impossible. By the time some of the trotskyist
organizations decided to destroy the assemblies, since they could not
control them, the participation of the middle class had already declined.
This occurred partly because of the brutal repression that met virtually
every one of the protests, but also because many people had hoped to
find immediate solutions.
At that point, although the
actions were huge, the movement did not recognize itself, nor was it
conscious of its power. Although the actions of December 19th and 20th
collectively opposed the representational political system, opposed
neoliberalism, and advocated for civil liberties, most of the participants
did not have a clear consciousness of the significance of their actions.
Furthermore, these people failed to recognize themselves as a powerful
movement that could build an alternative to the IMF/local-government
model. This failure explains how Congress was able to appoint a candidate
that had lost the presidential elections of 1999, even after two weeks
of falling administrations. Duhalde had a meeting with G.W. Bush in
which a potential succession to the presidency was discussed, in case
the De La Rua government failed. The possibility of a coup is currently
being investigated in the courts.
These massive mobilizations
unleashed incredible forces and creative methods of struggle. It reinforced
the struggle of the piqueteros and supported the recuperation of 200
factories under workers control, in which 10,000 people manage the production
and commercialization of everything from bread to tractors throughout
the country. It created the popular assemblies, neighborhood spaces
for discussion of these new politics, community services and coordination
of direct actions. Ezequiel Adamovsky, from the Cid Campeador Popular
Assembly, points out that it is because of the struggle of this movement
that the complete destruction of the Argentina economy and its working
class was somewhat avoided. For example, through massive direct actions,
the movements empowered the negotiations between the government and
the IMF, defaulting on its payment for a whole year. The devaluation
of the salaries was stopped through various protests. Ezequiel also
points out in La Vaca (URL), that these movements have created also
a new radical culture that is transforming politics into something new
and different, organized around three elements: horizontality, multiplicity
and autonomy.
Despite significant achievements,
these movements were never close to running the country. Furthermore,
a young movement is not likely to be able to contest a presidential
election. It should, however, strive to establish new solidarity networks
that will heal those broken by the dictatorship; it must continue to
grow and learn from its mistakes. This is happening every day in Argentina
and efforts are made internationally to support their struggle.
Patricio Mc Cabe, associated
with the Encuentro de Pensamiento Autonomo, a space for reflection on
social issues, suggests that the process that followed the mass actions
of December 19th and 20th can be evaluated by looking at what the government
has been forced to do in response: - Brutal repression of actions, evictions
of community centers and state terrorism, as in the execution of activists
like Dario Santillan of the piquetero organization Anibal Veron.
-Eviction of the worker-managed
Brukman factory and brutal repression of the 7,000 people action lead
by the workers, Madres de Plaza de Mayo, and national representatives
to recuperate the factory.
-Even more effective, after
the piquetes and the mass mobilizations, the government initiated a
welfare program benefitting more people than any program in any other
Latin American country.
-Savings were returned to
the middle class, however devaluated. This really deepened the gap between
the middle class and the unemployed workers and enjoyed propagandistic
support from a virtually monolithic media that favored "democracy"
and the elections while opposing the road blockades.
-Although the elections helped
the government by bringing the focus back to representational democracy,
as opposed to the ongoing direct democracy processes, it also exposed
a marked weakness of the system.
The elections process demands
further explanation and analysis. Appointed by Congress as an interim
President, with the task to call for elections in the near future, Duhalde
ignored his status and held onto power until June 2002. Responding to
pressure from the Governors of the Interior and to hints from the IMF,
the government ordered the repression of a massive road blockade that
ended with hundreds of people injured by the police, some with lead
bullets, and two piqueteros, Maxi Kosteki and Dario Santillan, dead.
Dario, a 21 year old organizer, was executed pointblank by the police
while helping Maxi, a 23 year old artist involved with the movements.
In the social upheaval that proceeded the repression, with thousands
of people protesting against state terrorism, the government called
for elections-but just presidential elections. At that point the social
movements felt strongly that the elections were a fraud; to participate
in them would be to turn the movements of December 2001 into an electoral
farce.
The electoral process reveals
a a pathetic and fraudulent system, especially after Menem's withdrawal
from the electoral process. When taking into account all of the people
who refused to vote, the newly elected president, Nestor Kirchner, won
thanks to a mere 16% of the electorate. Another symptom of this crisis
is a highly fragmented society and with it, the end of bipartisanship.
Perhaps more significantly, hardly anyone in Argentina has expressed
any excitement or expectations for any of the candidates. Despite the
fact that Argentine politicians now feel comfortable making public appearances
and even get some votes, they are definitely not in the presence of
people who have any illusions about the system.
However, people will not
abstain from voting in under the threat of state terror without a strong
alternative program to the corrupted democracy that the elections represent.
Lacking such an alternative, some people conceptualized a vote for Kirchner
as a vote against neoliberalism. This belief will most likely soon be
exposed as the same kind of ilussion that motivated people to elect
De la Rua as an alternative to Menem. De la Rua's administration resulted
in high unemployment, confiscated savings,lootings, and murderous repression
of massive spontaneous protests. People feel that Menem and his gang
should be kept out of power and rightly so. However, the change they
hope for will not come until they recognize an alternative to the system
he represents.
Pablo, a piquetero of the
Anibal Veron says, "The actions of December 19 and 20 were not
the proclamation of a revolutionary change nor did they completely bury
the old regime. As a counterbalance, the elections of April will not
heal the regime, wounded by the actions of 2001/2002, nor will they
have a long lasting effect on our hopes of social change."
The worker-controlled factories,
the micro-enterprises and community services of the unemployed workers,
the assemblies with their community-building programs, and the campesinos
who reclaim their land, and the radical art collectives constitute the
spaces where the new movements will find resources to grow and expand.
Their success can be measured there and not in an election, least of
all in this last one.