There are no breaking news at the moment

transsexual-attack-in-kochi

Bangkok, Thailand –The Indian authorities must end discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the formal justice system, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)said in a report released today.

The 60-paged report “Unnatural Offences”: Obstacles to Justice in India Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identitydocuments the challenges queer persons in India facewhile trying to access justice, starting from the impact of laws that criminalize people for their real or imputed sexual orientation and gender identity; to police harassment, violence and abuse; and todiscrimination and other hurdles within the justice system.

Based on 150 interviews across nine cities in India, including with people who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender, the report uses the term “queer” to refer to any individual who identifies with a non-normative sexuality or gender identity.

It includes individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and gender-queer, and also encompasses persons who may not fit into any of these identity categories.

“Criminalization, police violence, and the prejudiced attitudes of officials in the courts’ system have a profoundly detrimental impact on the ability and willingness of queer persons to resort to legal avenues to obtain justice,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Asia Director.

“The systemic discrimination and violence faced by queer persons in India, and the challenges they face accessing justice, are clearly contrary to India’s international human rights law obligations and the Indian Constitution,” he added.

The report also draws on responses from various government departments to ICJ’s requests under the Right to Information Act, both on the enforcement of the law against queer individuals and on gauging how legal entitlements have operated.

It describes how:

  • Laws like Section 377 of the IPC and some other broad and vaguely formulatedlaws, such as those that criminalize sex work and begging, are used by the police to persecute people based on their real or imputed sexual orientation and gender identity, and inhibit queer personsfrom accessing justice.

 

  • Even where the law purportedly provides legal entitlements and protections,queer persons continue to face a range of difficulties in accessing them.

 

  • Police violence, abuse and harassment areone of the biggest barriers to queer persons’ access to the justice system in India.

 

  • The challenges that lawyers who argue cases involving the human rights of queer persons combinewith the biases of officials in the formal justice systemcompoundingthe difficulties queer persons face in obtaining justice.

“The inspiring work of activists and human rights lawyers in India has led to positive judicial decisions showing the potential of the law to affirm human rights and ensure justice for all persons, irrespective of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” Zarifi said.

“Indian authorities should build on this momentum and take immediate steps to end the discrimination and violence queer persons face,” he added.

The ICJ reportmakes a number of recommendations to Indian authorities, which include:

  • Ensure that police officers promptly register and investigate any complaint regarding violence or any other criminal act filed by a queer person and/or on their behalf;

 

  • Provide legal and sensitization training relating to sexual orientation and gender identity to lawyers and judges under the State and District Legal Services Authority along with outreach programmes to facilitate queer individuals’ access to the justice system;

 

  • Repeal section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and vaguely worded criminal laws that invite discriminatory application, or substantially revise them to ensure there is no scope for abuse in their enforcement;

 

  • Withdraw the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill 2016 as currently drafted, engage in meaningful and substantial public consultation with members of the transgender community; and ensure that any process introduced for the legal recognition of gender identity is consistent with international human rights law and the NALSA

 

Contact

Sam Zarifi (Bangkok)

ICJ Asia Pacific Regional Director

+66 807819002

sam.zarifi(a)icj.org

 

Sanhita Ambast,

ICJ International Legal Advisor (Delhi),

+91 9810962193

email: Sanhita.ambast(a)icj.org

 

Additional information

The Indian authorities have an obligation to respect, protect and fulfill the rights to equality before the law, equal protection of the law and freedom from discrimination; the rights to privacy, liberty and security of the person, including the right not to be subjected to arbitrary arrest and detention; the right to life, to freedom from torture and other ill-treatment; and the right to access justice and to an effective remedy, for all persons, including queer people, without discrimination as to their real or imputed sexual orientation and gender identity.

As the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed, the Indian Constitution also guarantees several of these rights.

For example, in the seminal case of NALSA v UOI, the Court affirmed transgender persons’ right to their self-identified gender identity, based on the rights to equality, non-discrimination, freedom of expression and dignity.

 

Tags:

One Comment

  1. K SHESHU BABU says:

    The rampant discrimination of gender in delivering justice can be understood by the fact that almost no security personnel has been arrested or proved guilty in thousands of rapes on adivasi women in central India or Manipur or Kashmir. Similarly, almost no police or armed forces have been indicted in ‘ fake’ encounters in Kashmir or Chhattisgarh or Odisha. Even when ‘ women’ labelled as Maoists are killed, the SC has rarely ordered enquiry.
    This reflects the ruling class and patriarchy biased nature of Indian judicial system and it’s verdicts. The LGBTQ community is still suffering from social and judicial aversion on their rights.
    The ICJ report could not have come at a more appropriate time. At least now, SC must take drastic measures to avoid shameful accusations on its deliberations by the international agencies