There are no breaking news at the moment

Last year's record heat was fueled by a combination of the effects of global warming and one of the strongest El Niño events on record since at least 1950. (Photo: Project LM/flickr/cc)
Last year’s record heat was fueled by a combination of the effects of global warming and one of the strongest El Niño events on record since at least 1950. (Photo: Project LM/flickr/cc)

Global warming is on track to top 3° Celsius, the United Nations warned this week, because today’s climate pledges are “not nearly enough” to prevent dangerous levels of warming.

That’s according the latest annual “Emissions GapReport” (pdf) from the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), which concluded that pledges to cut emissions will result in a global temperature rise of 3.4ºC above pre-industrial levels, far above the 2º limit and 1.5º goal agreed to under last year’s Paris climate accord.

“Current commitments will reduce emissions by no more than a third of the levels required by 2030 to avert disaster,” two UNEP leaders warn in the report’s introduction.

“This is a stark warning that cannot be ignored—tougher action on climate change is urgently needed to prevent the world speeding towards catastrophe,” Asad Rehman, a climate campaigner with Friends of the Earth (FOE) International, told the Guardian. “Governments are drinking in the ‘last chance saloon’ if the lofty goals of the Paris climate agreement are to be met.”

“After 24 years of negotiations we are hurtling towards a 3.5 degree world, which will be catastrophic for millions across the world,” added Dipti Bhatnagar, a climate justice and energy coordinator also at FOE International. “Despite all the science-based evidence, rich countries are failing to do their fair share of emissions reductions as well as provide much-needed finance to drive energy transformation in developing countries.”

UNEP releases its analysis of global fossil fuel emissions and climate pledges to reduce them each year, and “[t]he 2016 assessment is especially significant for three reasons,” observes John H. Cushman Jr. at InsideClimate News:

It is being published just as the treaty enters into force, as countries are starting to plan their next steps. It is the first assessment to calculate the emissions that will occur under all the pledges made last year. And it is the first to hold those pledges up not only to the long standing 2-degree goal, but to the new 1.5-degree goal that was a central accomplishment of the Paris meeting last December.

Now that the treaty has been signed by enough countries to enter into force on November 4—much sooner than many had expected—delegates arriving in Marrakech for next week’s conference of parties are keen to keep the momentum building.

If international leaders fail to step up, UNEP warns, “we will mourn the loss of biodiversity and natural resources. We will regret the economic fallout. Most of all, we will grieve over the avoidable human tragedy; the growing numbers of climate refugees hit by hunger, poverty, illness and conflict will be a constant reminder of our failure to deliver.”

“None of this will be the result of bad weather. It will be the result of bad choices by governments, private sector, and individual citizens,” the agency heads note. “Because there are choices.”

The challenge is stark: the report finds that global annual greenhouse gas emissions need to be cut by an additional 12 billion-14 billion metric tons by 2030 in order to limit warming to 2ºC. “To put the challenge into perspective,” U.S. News & World Reportobserves, “UNEP noted that the gap is 12 times the annual emissions of the 28-nation European Union’s transport sector, including aviation.”

As heads of state from around the world descend on Marrekech, Morocco, for the COP22climate conference set to begin on November 7, UNEP hopes the report will be “a wakeup call to the world.”

First published in CommonDreams.org

3 Comments

  1. K SHESHU BABU says:

    Agreements and negotiations on climate change have little impact unless they are translated inyo actions. Mere announcing measures for control and reduction of carbon emissions without actually follow-up action can yield very little as can be seen from the present climate change reports. The threshold of 2.5 degrees is slowly passing into history. Now, with hottest temperatures on the record for successive months, the limit may rise to three degrees. A stage may come when reverting to pollution-free world may be utopia. Government’s policy on climate change is not proactive.

  2. The evidence of complete destruction by the actors rooted in suicidal modern civilization is being disregarded as if it did not matter. To what extent is the action based on evidence debated in electioneering? The Clinton Trump example is there which shows they are least interested in an economy which has healthy nature as its base. Pralaya is being accelerated. See Terry Tamminen.2006.Lives per Gallon. The true cost of our oil addiction. Also see Collaterals of Climate Change:Redesign living so no squandering of fossil fuel at ten percent efficiency occurs at
    http://collateralsofclimatechange.blogspot.in/2015/12/redesign-living-so-no-squandering-of.html
    Dont ignore the evidence spelled out so blaringly on the mischievious paramour the world’s dams which must accompany the base loaded thermal and nuclear stations at
    The science of dams causing earthquakes and climate change at
    http://predictingquakes.blogspot.in/2015/04/the-science-of-dams-causing-earthquakes.html
    Taking one look at the specialist society that modern civilization is, Mahatma Gandhi acted furiously to attack it saying: Given enough time modern civilization will destroy itself(1908). He also said: The West can meet the East when the West has thrown overboard almost the whole of modern civilization. The West can also meet the East when the East embraces modern civilization. But that will be an armed truce.
    And now the actors like Putin are warning that if the US elects Clinton, it means the begin of the Third World War and risks nuclear war. Idiots really. These are the same evils which caused Fukushima triple melt slated to kill all the babies born in India every year from 2028 onwards. So no wonder Africans are quitting the ICC! Criminals are who they are asking and the Marshall Isles. And India abstained from UN resolution seeking ban on nuclear weapons.But the Gita says: Imperishable is the supreme Brahman. Its dwelling in each individual is called Adhyatma. The offering in Return which causes the genesis and support of beings is called KARMA. What a retreat!

  3. I have just flown to India from UK. My carbon footprint is 1.2 tonnes of carbon. How can I offset this? There is no scheme that truly puts this carbon back into the ground.

    Here is my modest proposal. Environmental groups should buy coal and dump it, to put it out of reach of consumption in the same way that they buy forests to put them out of reach of consumption. For myself, I plan to buy 1.2 tonnes of coal and bury it in my garden.